|
Written by Dan Levy
|
|
Monday, 09 March 2009 13:33 |
|

On this 50th anniversary of the Barbie doll, Slate has a great piece on Ken, Barbie's loyal gentleman companion. The author points out that Ken has always been an afterthought, an accessory created to serve Barbie's-- and her chubby cheeked handlers'-- every whim. No great revelations here, but it's interesting how, for all the debate over Barbie's feminist credentials, hardly any ink has been spilled over Ken.
So what do you think Ken-- with his Aryan looks and chameleon fashion sense--says to young girls about the ideal man? Does he set their standards too high? Is this plastic adonis dooming women to disappointment once they inevitably learn that not all men are dying to be grooms or to wait on their partners hand and foot?
Without Ken to confuse expectations, would we have Sex and the City or He's Just Not That Into You?
Would that be a good thing?
In any case: happy 50th, Barbie. And Happy 48th, Ken-- not that anyone is counting.
|
|
Last Updated on Tuesday, 10 March 2009 12:20 |
MAN'S LAST doubleSTANDard
I like this article. I am tired of being pigeon-holed into the ever-immature, intellectual light-weight. And I'm not ...
Teaching Gender: guides for guyland
I may have missed the original opportunity to comment on the Dove ad, but one thing about it stuck out for me... The...
Men and Their Secrets: Dexter, Don Draper, and the...
Great article... I have had a thing for Dexter (less so) and Draper (much more so) for a while now, but have always f...
Men and Their Secrets: Dexter, Don Draper, and the...
Dan Levy's article made me think about the male actor prototypes of my teenage years (the 60's). The laconic loners w...
Horn Porn, Fratire, and the market of manliness
"I am hungry, I am incorrigible: I am man!" Haven't seen that BurgerKing commercial before - really glad I do...